Loading market dashboard
State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF
RWXFinancial ServicesAMEXUS
Loading disclosure news
News and disclosures filtered by period, publisher, and event group.
Select a headline to open the full news page in the app.
Surging oil prices and hotter inflation reports reignited rate-hike concerns, sending Treasury yields to one-year highs as the Iran conflict remained stalemated despite the highly anticipated Trump-Xi summit.
Expense ratios and portfolio focus set these two real estate ETFs apart, despite matching yields. Explore how their holdings and risk profiles compare.
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.12% compared to 0.59% for State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF. The Vanguard fund offers a higher trailing dividend yield and broader diversification with 682 holdings while the SPDR fund holds 121 positions.
U.S. equity markets advanced for a fifth straight week - their longest winning streak since 2024 - as strong earnings, resilient data, and hopes for lasting Iran peace fueled optimism. Investors looked through another oil-price surge and inflationary pressure, focusing instead on corporate resilience and economic strength despite a complex macro backdrop shaped by geopolitical and policy uncertainty. The Fed held rates steady in an unusually fractured 8-4 vote, while Powell's plan to remain on the Board broke precedent and raised politically charged succession questions.
GQRE charges a lower expense ratio and offers a higher dividend yield than RWX. RWX outperformed on one-year return, but GQRE showed stronger five-year growth and a slightly milder max drawdown.
REET carries a much lower expense ratio and greater assets under management than RWX. RWX delivered a stronger one-year return but lagged REET over five years on a total return basis.
HAUZ delivers a much lower expense ratio and higher yield than RWX Both ETFs returned 13.4% over the past year, but HAUZ holds more names and covers more of the global real estate sector Liquidity profiles are similar and HAUZ manages more assets.
VNQI charges a much lower expense ratio and boasts a higher dividend yield than RWX. RWX is more concentrated, with only 121 holdings, while VNQI holds more than 700 positions.
RWR charges a lower expense ratio and has much larger assets under management (AUM) than RWX. RWX posted a higher one-year total return, but RWR experienced a smaller maximum drawdown over five years.
ICF is less expensive to own but pays a lower yield than RWX. RWX delivered a higher 1-year return, while ICF outperformed over the last five years.
